Case Decision - 352279

Case decision:

The South African Heritage Resources Agency (SAHRA) reviewed your application.

Please be advised as follows:

1. The SAHRA was unable to consider the merits of the application as the work had already commenced and is now completed. 
2. As a result, a permit cannot be issued retrospectively.
3. The SAHRA would like to draw your attention to the fact that your failure to obtain a permit prior to the commencement of work, is in contravention of Section 27(18) of the NHRA, and as per Section 51(1)(a) of the NHRA you may be liable to a fine or imprisonment or both. 
4. However, SAHRA has decided to condone your failure to obtain a permit as required on condition that the work done was conducted strictly in accordance with the documentation submitted:

• ALLURE POA - HERITAGE ARCHITECT[1]_0.pdf
• Appendix A Site Plan, Sections and Elevations.pdf
• Appendix B Site and Ground Floor Plan.pdf
• ELC and SAHRA Heritage Agreement 8 Sep 16.pdf
• KPI 4.3 Inspection_Lutheran Church_Allure Restaurant_20240502.pdf
• SAHRA_BEU_ELC_ContraventionNotice_20240618.pdf
• Allure Rooftop Lounge HIA .pdf
• 0811-2024 CIBRA COMMENTS.pdf
• CIBRA stamped Architectural Plan.pdf

5. Prior written approval from SAHRA is required for any deviation from the approved plans.
6. No legal action will be instituted against you in this instance.

SAHRA reminds the applicant to adhere to the necessary procedures regarding changes to National Heritage Sites, as per Section 27(18) of the National Heritage Resources Act (NHRA) no 25 of 1999.